Retirement village living has emerged as one of Australia’s most popular housing options for older Australians, with approximately 250,000 seniors currently calling retirement communities home. However, deciding whether to move to a retirement village is a significant life decision that requires careful consideration of both the substantial benefits and considerable drawbacks. While retirement villages offer compelling advantages including vibrant social communities, low-maintenance living, and aged-in-place flexibility, they also present complex financial structures, intricate contracts, and potential exit fee complications that can surprise unsuspecting residents. This comprehensive guide explores the pros and cons of retirement village living in Australia to help you make an informed decision about whether this lifestyle suits your needs and financial circumstances.
The Significant Advantages of Retirement Village Living
Social Connection and Combat Against Loneliness
One of the most compelling benefits of retirement village living is the strong sense of community and meaningful social connections it fosters. Research published in the Journal of Applied Gerontology demonstrates that residents who participate in social activities within retirement villages report significantly higher levels of well-being, greater life satisfaction, and markedly lower levels of depression compared to their isolated counterparts. This is particularly important given that over a quarter of older Australians live alone according to the 2015 Australian Bureau of Statistics Census, and social isolation is a leading cause of hospitalisation in older people.
The best retirement villages in Canberra | Canberra Daily
Retirement villages offer structured activities and opportunities for residents to interact and connect through organised events including fitness classes, movie nights, group outings, craft sessions, book clubs, and community dining experiences. These activities provide opportunities for residents to engage in meaningful conversations, form genuine friendships, and participate in activities that foster a sense of belonging. The result is not merely improved mental health—research shows that robust social engagement can help prevent cognitive decline, reduce dementia risk, and even extend longevity itself.
Low-Maintenance Lifestyle and Freedom from Property Responsibilities
A major attraction of retirement village living is liberation from the exhausting responsibilities of home and garden maintenance that many retirees find increasingly burdensome. Retirement villages handle all maintenance, gardening, repairs, landscaping, and general property upkeep, freeing residents from the stress of managing these tasks as they age. This “lock-and-leave” convenience is particularly valuable for residents who enjoy travel, as they can depart for extended holidays knowing their property is secure, maintained, and monitored by on-site staff.
For those downsizing from large family homes, the reduced responsibility can significantly enhance quality of life and eliminate the financial burden of unexpected home repairs or renovations. This freedom allows residents to redirect their time and energy toward hobbies, travel, social activities, and spending quality time with family and friends—priorities that often get neglected during years of home maintenance responsibilities.
Enhanced Safety, Security, and Peace of Mind
Retirement villages are specifically designed with seniors’ safety and security needs in mind, incorporating multiple layers of protection that provide genuine peace of mind. Villages typically feature comprehensive security measures including gated and fenced perimeters, surveillance cameras, motion-sensor lighting, and 24-hour on-site security teams. Homes within villages are designed with accessibility features such as non-slip flooring, grab rails, lever-style door handles, emergency call systems, and motion-activated lighting—all designed to prevent falls and injuries.
Additionally, most villages maintain dedicated on-site management staff, and many have medically trained personnel available to respond to health emergencies. This ensures quick access to emergency assistance in the event of a fall, medical episode, or other health crisis. Many villages are co-located with aged care facilities or have access to allied health practitioners, offering additional reassurance for residents concerned about future health needs.
Access to Amenities and Activities
Water activities at retirement communities can be key to
Retirement villages typically offer extensive facilities and amenities that cater to diverse interests and promote active, healthy lifestyles. Common facilities include swimming pools, fully equipped gymnasiums, tennis courts, lawn bowls greens, hobby and craft rooms, libraries, community centres, gardens, walking trails, and organised group outings. Many villages provide on-site wellness programs and fitness classes specifically designed for older adults, enabling residents to exercise safely at their own pace.
These facilities create a resort-like atmosphere where residents can maintain an active lifestyle without having to leave the community or manage the costs and logistics of accessing external fitness facilities. For many retirees, this represents a significant lifestyle upgrade compared to remaining in family homes where such amenities may be inaccessible or prohibitively expensive.
Flexibility in Care Options and Ageing in Place
Many Australian retirement villages operate on an “ageing in place” philosophy, offering a continuum of care that allows residents to transition from independent living to increased levels of support as their health needs evolve. This flexibility means residents can begin in independent villas and progress to serviced apartments with additional support, or even move to on-site aged care facilities without leaving the community they’ve grown to love.
This model helps residents maintain independence and dignity for longer while ensuring support is available when needed. Research indicates that this aged-in-place approach can delay entry into high-level aged care facilities by an average of five years, allowing seniors to enjoy independent living for longer periods. This flexibility is particularly valuable for couples where one partner requires higher levels of care—they can remain connected to each other and their community rather than being separated by moves to different facilities.
Financial Predictability and Potential Cost Efficiency
For some retirees, retirement village living can provide better financial predictability compared to home ownership or remaining in their family home. Unlike traditional home ownership where maintenance costs can be sudden and unpredictable—a major plumbing issue, roof replacement, or garden renovation can cost thousands of dollars—retirement village residents benefit from fixed ongoing fees that cover maintenance, security, gardening, and facility management.
This predictability is particularly valuable for retirees living on fixed pensions, as it eliminates financial surprises and allows for accurate budgeting. Research from UTS and the Property Council indicates that in some locations, particularly Sydney where residential property prices are exceptionally high, retirement village living can provide better value for money compared to general residential downsizing alternatives.
The Significant Drawbacks of Retirement Village Living
Complex and Often Substantial Financial Costs
While retirement villages can offer certain cost advantages, the financial structures are considerably more complex than standard property ownership, and costs can ultimately be quite substantial. Understanding these costs is essential before committing to retirement village living.
Entry or ingoing fees are typically the first major expense, ranging from as little as $100,000 to over $2 million depending on location, property age, and village facilities. According to the 2023 Property Council of Australia report, the median entry price for a two-bedroom unit is approximately $559,000, which typically represents around 70% of the local median house price in the same postcode.
Ongoing or recurrent fees (sometimes called maintenance charges or body corporate fees) are charged regularly, typically ranging from $350 to $1,000 per month, though resort-style villages can exceed $1,000 monthly. These fees cover services including maintenance, gardening, security, facility management, and staff salaries.
Deferred Management Fees (DMFs), however, represent the most significant and controversial cost component. DMFs are typically calculated as a percentage of the entry price—commonly between 20% to 40%, sometimes reaching up to 37.5%. These fees are deducted from your exit payment when you leave the village, effectively reducing your return on investment significantly.
For example, a resident who enters a village with a $400,000 entry fee and stays for six or more years might face a 30% DMF ($120,000), meaning they would only receive $280,000 upon exit if the resale price matches their original entry price. Many residents report going backwards financially, particularly if they leave within the first few years or if property values don’t appreciate.
Exit or departure fees can also apply, ranging from 25% to 40% of the resale price, depending on the specific contract. Additionally, residents may be charged refurbishment costs before their unit is re-let or resold—costs that have “risen considerably” since COVID, according to operators, and can range from $15,000 to $20,000 or more.
Opaque Contracts and Lack of Consumer Protections
Retirement village contracts are notoriously complex, vary significantly between operators and states, and often include clauses that limit residents’ rights. Many residents and their families describe contracts as “an absolute minefield” of complex terms, fee calculations, and legal obligations. Unlike standard property purchases, these agreements often involve legal structures such as leaseholds, loan and licence arrangements, or strata titles—each with different implications for ownership, taxation, and exit costs.
The complexity is compounded by the fact that regulations vary significantly between Australian states and territories. What protections exist in New South Wales may not exist in Victoria or South Australia, creating inconsistent consumer protection frameworks. Many experts and advocates have called for federal oversight and a mandatory national code of conduct, noting that the current “regulatory patchwork” provides insufficient protection.
The Retirement Living Code of Conduct, established in 2020 by industry bodies, sets standards for operators but is voluntary rather than mandatory. While operators who sign the Code commit to transparency, fair contracts, and effective dispute resolution, not all operators participate. Furthermore, even Code signatories have faced complaints about contract complexity and unexpected fees.
Significant Loss of Financial Returns and Exit Fee Complications
For many residents, the financial reality of leaving a retirement village can be disappointing and even devastating. Numerous cases illustrate the dramatic financial losses residents experience when they leave. One 89-year-old resident, Joan Green, purchased her unit for $384,000 and, after 11 years, faced exit fees totalling approximately $300,000 (80% of her initial payment), leaving her with just $81,000—effectively losing $303,000. Another resident, Ann Threlfall, left after less than three years having paid $310,000, but after deducting various fees she was left with just $243,000—a loss of $67,000 in less than three years.
The financial impact is particularly severe for residents who remain in villages for extended periods or whose health deteriorates, forcing them to leave. A 2024 ABC News investigation found that some residents continue to be charged maintenance fees for months or even years after leaving their units, as operators wait for new residents to be found. While some states have now imposed maximum timeframes (typically six months in NSW, extending to longer periods in other states) for charging these continuing maintenance costs, the financial burden remains substantial.
Loss of Privacy and Space
Moving to a retirement village often requires significant downsizing from family homes, resulting in substantial loss of personal space. Many residents sacrifice dedicated workshops, garages, gardens, guest rooms, and quiet private areas. This downsizing can be emotionally challenging, requiring residents to part with cherished belongings and adjust to smaller living environments.
Close proximity to other residents means reduced privacy and can feel intrusive for those accustomed to traditional neighbourhood living. In some cases, residents report being able to hear neighbours’ televisions or conversations, particularly in older weatherboard-constructed units. Additionally, retirement villages often lack the generational diversity of typical neighbourhoods—the homogeneous age demographic, while providing age-peer socialization, can also feel limiting and isolating for some residents, particularly those who value intergenerational interaction.
Restrictive Rules and Limited Autonomy
Retirement villages typically enforce rules and restrictions that can feel oppressive to residents accustomed to complete autonomy. Common restrictions include limitations on pet ownership (though many modern villages now welcome pets), visitor policies, renovation or decoration guidelines, and specifications for alterations or furnishings.
Additionally, many village contracts include provisions that restrict residents’ rights in unexpected ways. Some contracts prevent residents from making complaints or pursuing internal disputes without threat of retribution or eviction, a practice identified as “discouragement” that constitutes abuse under some state regulations. This power imbalance—where operators are large institutional entities with legal representation, while residents are often elderly individuals navigating complex processes alone—creates significant barriers to fair treatment.
Emotional and Psychological Adjustment Challenges
Moving from a long-term family home is emotionally significant, particularly for retirees who have lived in the same house for decades. The move requires not only physical downsizing but also emotional adjustment to a new community, new neighbours, and a fundamentally different lifestyle. For some residents, this transition triggers sadness, grief, or depression related to loss of independence, familiar surroundings, and the life they’ve known.
Additionally, introverts or residents who value solitude may find the communal nature of retirement villages challenging or exhausting. The constant availability of social activities and proximity to neighbours can leave some residents feeling overwhelmed rather than enriched.
Understanding Retirement Village Contracts and Financial Models
Contract Types and Occupancy Arrangements
Australian retirement villages operate under several different legal structures, each with different financial and ownership implications:
Leasehold arrangements involve paying an entry fee to lease the property for a specified term (commonly 99 years or longer). Under these arrangements, the operator retains ownership of the property, and residents have security of tenure through the registered lease. Upon exit, the lease typically ends and the property returns to the operator.
Strata title or community scheme villages allow residents to purchase freehold title to their home and own a share of common property. Residents become members of an owners corporation and are responsible for paying ongoing strata levies (similar to body corporate fees in apartment buildings). Upon sale, residents retain proceeds from the property sale minus agreed fees.
Loan and licence arrangements involve residents making a payment that provides a licence (not ownership) to occupy the property. These arrangements often include deferred management fees.
Company title schemes involve purchasing shares in a company that owns the village, rather than directly owning property.
The choice between these arrangements has significant financial implications, and it’s essential to understand which model applies to the village you’re considering.
Deferred Management Fees Explained
Deferred Management Fees have become increasingly controversial in the retirement village sector. Originally introduced in Australia during the 1980s as a mechanism for operators to recover capital costs and pay shareholders, DMFs allow operators to defer a portion of management and maintenance costs until residents exit, typically charging between 20% to 40% of the entry price.
Operators argue that DMFs provide financial flexibility for residents by allowing lower upfront costs and more predictable ongoing fees. However, critics contend that DMFs effectively function as hidden “exit taxes” that dramatically reduce financial returns, particularly for residents who live in villages for extended periods.
Importantly, some retirement living operators have chosen not to charge DMFs, instead recovering costs through higher entry fees and modest weekly site fees, offering greater transparency about costs. National Seniors Australia has advocated for DMFs to be made illegal in new retirement village contracts, arguing they are unfair to residents and reduce financial returns unreasonably.
Cooling-Off Periods and Money-Back Guarantees
Australian law provides cooling-off periods that protect residents’ right to reconsider their decision after signing a contract. However, these periods vary significantly by state:
- Victoria: 3 business days
- South Australia: 10 business days
- New South Wales: 7 days
- Queensland: 14 business days
- Tasmania: 5 business days
Additionally, some states provide “settling-in periods” (usually 90 days) during which residents can leave without paying departure fees. This provides a test period to confirm the village is suitable before making a long-term commitment.
Some operators, such as Aveo, go beyond statutory requirements by offering extended cooling-off periods (21 days) or money-back guarantees (90 days) across multiple states. Before signing, carefully review your specific village’s cooling-off and settling-in provisions.
Geographic Variations and State Regulation
Retirement villages operate under different regulatory frameworks in each Australian state and territory, resulting in inconsistent consumer protections. Victoria, New South Wales, Queensland, South Australia, Western Australia, Tasmania, and the ACT all have separate Retirement Villages Acts with different requirements for disclosure, contracts, dispute resolution, and consumer protection.
This regulatory patchwork has been identified as a significant problem, with advocates calling for national harmonisation to ensure consistent standards across Australia. Recent legislative reviews in multiple states (Victoria, South Australia, Western Australia, Tasmania, and Queensland) are considering reforms to strengthen consumer protections, but implementation varies by jurisdiction.
The lack of national consistency is particularly problematic for disputes—residents seeking fair resolution often find themselves disadvantaged, facing operators with institutional legal resources while they navigate complex local tribunal processes alone.
Complaint Mechanisms and Dispute Resolution
Current Dispute Resolution Options
When disputes arise between residents and operators, several options exist depending on your state:
Internal dispute resolution through the village’s internal disputes committee is typically the first step. However, research shows these processes can be slow and residents sometimes feel disadvantaged.
External dispute resolution options vary by state. NSW Fair Trading provides a free complaint service for residents, and ACAT (Administrative Appeals Tribunal) offers formal dispute resolution, though this process can be adversarial and expensive.
Retirement Living Code of Conduct complaints: Residents of Code-signatory villages can submit complaints to the Code Administrator and Code Review Panel, though this is voluntary industry regulation rather than statutory protection.
State-based human rights commissions: In some states, residents can file complaints with bodies such as the Victorian Civil and Administrative Tribunal or the ACT Human Rights Commission.
Despite these options, research shows significant barriers exist for residents seeking fair resolution. Many feel overwhelmed by complex processes, lack legal resources, and report that operators’ legal teams have significant advantages.
Calls for Reform and Ombudsman Services
Consumer advocates and politicians, including federal Centre Alliance MP Rebekha Sharkie, have called for a dedicated retirement housing ombudsman service to support residents through dispute resolution. Sharkie has described retirement village contracts as “a form of corporatised elder abuse” and has advocated for federal regulation that would bring retirement villages under ASIC oversight as financial products.
However, these calls for reform have largely gone unheeded. As noted by consumer advocate groups, legislative reviews that resulted in recommendations have seen little implementation, with Victorian recommendations made eight years ago still not fully enacted.
Making Your Decision: Is a Retirement Village Right for You?
Ideal Candidates for Retirement Village Living
Retirement village living suits older Australians who:
- Prioritise social engagement and value a vibrant community environment
- Want to eliminate home and garden maintenance responsibilities
- Desire built-in safety and security features
- Appreciate access to organised activities and amenities
- Are comfortable with downsizing to smaller living spaces
- Value flexibility and the option to access increasing care as needed
- Can afford entry and ongoing fees without jeopardising financial security
- Prefer predictable, fixed ongoing costs over variable home maintenance expenses
Poor Candidates for Retirement Village Living
Retirement villages may not be suitable if you:
- Highly value complete autonomy and dislike rules or restrictions
- Prefer multigenerational neighbourhoods with diverse age demographics
- Want to maintain a large home or extensive personal space
- Prioritise maximising financial returns on property investment
- Have concerns about contract complexity or financial transparency
- Value the ability to easily exit without substantial financial penalties
- Prefer living independently without community oversight
- Are uncomfortable downsizing emotionally or don’t wish to part with possessions
Essential Steps Before Making a Decision
If you’re considering retirement village living, experts recommend several critical steps:
1. Visit multiple villages and spend time observing the community, speaking with residents, and assessing whether the lifestyle appeals to you genuinely.
2. Seek independent legal and financial advice from professionals who specialise in retirement village contracts. This is not optional—it’s essential. Legal professionals can identify potential risks, explain complex terms, and ensure the contract protects your interests.
3. Carefully read all documentation, particularly the contract, disclosure statement, and rules of conduct. Understand all fees including entry fees, ongoing costs, deferred management fees, and potential exit costs.
4. Calculate your likely financial return under different scenarios—what you’ll receive if you leave within 5 years, 10 years, 20 years. Compare this to other retirement housing options.
5. Consider your future health needs and confirm the village can support you as your care requirements increase, or that you’re comfortable with the transition process.
6. Understand the state-specific regulations that apply to your chosen village, particularly cooling-off periods, settling-in periods, and dispute resolution processes.
7. Discuss the decision with family and trusted advisors before committing.
The Future of Retirement Village Living in Australia
The retirement village sector in Australia is experiencing significant growth, driven by the aging population and strong demand from baby boomers entering retirement. The sector generates over $5.4 billion in revenue annually and employment for 29,000 people. Occupancy rates are exceptionally high, reaching 95% in 2023, demonstrating strong demand.
However, the sector faces challenges. Development pipelines have collapsed by more than half from projected forecasts, supply is not keeping pace with demand, and regulatory uncertainty in multiple states is creating hesitation about new development investment. Additionally, significant consumer protection concerns remain unresolved, with longstanding calls for reform largely unheeded.
Looking forward, industry observers and consumer advocates anticipate continued pressure for federal regulation, possible establishment of a dedicated ombudsman service, and harmonisation of retirement village laws across states. The sector will likely see continued pressure to improve transparency, simplify contracts, and address exit fee controversies.
Conclusion: Making an Informed Choice
Retirement village living in Australia offers compelling benefits for many older Australians—meaningful community, reduced maintenance burdens, enhanced safety, and flexibility as care needs evolve. For socially engaged retirees seeking a vibrant, supported lifestyle with predictable costs, retirement village living can be genuinely enriching and financially advantageous.
However, the decision should not be made lightly. The financial structures are complex, fees can be substantial, contracts often favour operators over residents, and consumer protections remain inconsistent and sometimes inadequate. Many residents report significant financial losses and feel trapped by complex contracts with exit fees consuming 25-40% or more of their equity.
The key to making a successful decision is thorough due diligence. Seek independent legal and financial advice, understand all costs under realistic scenarios, spend time assessing specific villages and their communities, and carefully read all documentation before committing. Ask critical questions about what happens if your health deteriorates, how fees might increase over time, and what your realistic financial return would be.
By taking these steps and carefully weighing the pros and cons against your personal circumstances, values, and financial situation, you can make an informed decision about whether retirement village living aligns with your vision for your retirement years. For many Australians, it represents an excellent lifestyle choice; for others, remaining in their family home or exploring alternative retirement housing options may be more appropriate. The key is understanding the realities—both positive and negative—and making a deliberate choice that genuinely suits your needs.